Why the heck did we watch Pulp Fiction in class?

No, it was not because I thought you guys needed a break from class or because I think it is a great movie. Unfortunately, due to time constraints, we were not able to have a detailed class discussion where we could apply the film to our composition class.

Rhetorical analysis and synthesis papers are very formal and usually lack personality and creativity. In fact, going against the grain is discouraged. Strict structure is stressed (look at that alliteration!) and, frankly, it teaches how to perform a task-based writing. Whereas argument is the place where you can throw all structure out of the window, if you really wanted to.

What makes an argument interesting? What draws us in? Is it content...or is it the presentation of the content? I argue that it is the presentation. If there are two people writing about the same issue and both have the same claims, what would make one more interesting than the other? Style.

Does something have to be presented in a chronological order for it to be effective? No. Should you take the safe road when there are ways to be unique and show the audience something in a way they aren't used to? That is up to you.

Many people walk away from watching Pulp Fiction either confused or amazed. They don't know how they feel about the movie at first. It is one of those movies where you think about it afterwards. Is that not the epitome of being effective? Ask yourself: What is the point of an argument? Is it to simply show your side of an issue, or is it to enlighten and stimulate thought and possible action?

Why did I have you pay attention to one particular aspect in the film? The purpose was for you to watch one side so we could break it down and really analyze the film. Some of you had topics which were specific to only a few scenes, but those few scenes were arguably some of the most shocking. What led up to it all? I am not saying that this film is laced with argument after argument on each of the topics I gave you, but it is addressing many issues that stimulate thought.

Think...what scene is most vivid to you? Why was it that scene? I can almost guarantee that there would be at least 10 different answers from the class.

So, comment to this post and tell me: What scene did you feel was most effective? Why? How was the scene presented?

Quentin Tarantino is known for his creativity. Would this movie have been as interesting if it was written/directed by someone who sticks to the straight path? I don't think so...No...I really don't think so. Style. It can make or break you.